Search :

home
latest updates
explore themes
user guide
contact us
Literature
Projects
Software
Standards
Promotion Projects
Standards Committees
Organisations
Researchers
Teams
Centers Of Excellence

Explore > Themes > Metadata Schemas > Literature > An Extensible Approach for Modeling Ontologies in RDF(S)

An Extensible Approach for Modeling Ontologies in RDF(S)



Link to this resource

RDF(S) constitutes a newly emerging standard for metadata that is about to turn the World Wide Web into a machine-understandable knowledge base. It is an XML application that allows for the denotation of facts and schemata in a web-compatible format, building on an elaborate object-model for describing concepts and relations. Thus, it might turn up as a natural choice for a widely-useable ontology description language. However, its lack of capabilities for describing the semantics of concepts and relations beyond those provided by inheritance mechanisms makes it a rather weak language for even the most austere knowledge-based system. This paper presents an approach for modeling ontologies in RDF(S) that also considers axioms as objects that are describable in RDF(S). Thus, we provide flexible, extensible, and adequate means for accessing and exchanging axioms in RDF(S). Our approach follows the spirit of the World Wide Web, as we do not assume a global axiom specification language that is too intractable for one purpose and too weak for the next, but rather a methodology that allows (communities of) users to specify what axioms are interesting in their domain.

This paper addresses the issues that other commentators have made about RDF and RDFS, i.e. that they have very limited expressivity as far as schematic constraints are concerned (see "A Comparison of Schemas for Video Metadata Representation" in this theme). It involves a the definition of a schema which controls the composition relationships between the vocabulary primitives. This paper presents the semantics of this schema in terms of a frame-logic, but the results are generalisable and provide a tractable way of dealing with complex schemata. Terminologically speaking it addresses ontologies (the authors are rooted in the Knowledge community) but their discussions are equally applicable to all schema description systems.

Standards discussed by this literature

Researchers that authored this literature Teams which were involved in producing this literature
 
  Developed by the IAM Research Group, University Of Southampton, UK
and funded by the Defence Evaluation and Research Agency (DERA), UK